{"id":160,"date":"2008-10-27T21:31:04","date_gmt":"2008-10-28T02:31:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/moriahjovan.com\/mojo\/?p=160"},"modified":"2025-07-31T20:22:01","modified_gmt":"2025-08-01T01:22:01","slug":"book-review-do-the-math","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/moriahjovan.com\/talesofdunham\/blog\/book-review-do-the-math\/","title":{"rendered":"Book Review: Do the Math"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-15996 alignright\" src=\"https:\/\/moriahjovan.com\/talesofdunham\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/10\/20081027_dothemath.jpg\" alt=\"Cover of DO THE MATH by Philip Persinger\" width=\"267\" height=\"400\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.amazon.com\/Do-Math-Inevitable-Philip-Persinger\/dp\/0595706886\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"><em>Do the Math<\/em><\/a><br \/>\nby Philip B. Persinger \ud83d\udc94<br \/>\npublished by iUniverse<\/p>\n<p>I read a <a href=\"http:\/\/moriahjovan.com\/talesofdunham\/blog\/the-pink-collar-ghetto\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">review of this book that pissed me off<\/a>, but the blurb looked interesting and so I went forth to iUniverse (yes, it\u2019s independently published) to purchase the ebook. I will spare you the nightmare of actually getting the book, but iUniverse? Bite me. Fortunately, the author came through for me when I copied him on my bitchmail to iUniverse (which they still haven\u2019t responded to). Anyway, he got me a print copy of his book posthaste and so I was a fan on that basis alone.<\/p>\n<p>Here\u2019s the blurb:<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"normal\"><p>What could be worse than losing the love of your life? Getting her back!<\/p>\n<p>William Teale is a brilliant professor of mathematics. His theory of inevitability posits that any human action, no matter how insignificant, might result in a disproportionately huge calamity.<\/p>\n<p>His wife, Virginia \u201cFaye\u201d Warner, is a world-famous romance novelist who specializes in reuniting soul mates after a tragic and prolonged separation. According to her math, \u201cone past and two hearts plus one love equals four-ever.\u201d The Teale-Warner marriage is a thing of geometric and artistic perfection, a melding of the heart and the brain-<em>amour<\/em> and algebra.<\/p>\n<p>But when Faye\u2019s ghostwriter suffers a nervous breakdown and shakes all the arrows out of Cupid\u2019s quiver, Faye reintroduces her husband to love. Unfortunately, it\u2019s not with herself, but with the woman William had loved and lost years ago. Love is about to clash with inevitability, and it\u2019s unclear which will emerge victorious.<\/p>\n<p>Told in the off-beat voice of William\u2019s graduate intern, Roger, <em>Do the Math<\/em> reveals the curious relationship between logic and love and the delightful consequences of taking a chance.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Only one bad point and it\u2019s technical: The funky paragraph breaks in dialog. Oh, I don\u2019t mean the looooong monologues that have to be broken, but, for example:<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"normal\"><p>\u201cHer home away from home,\u201d he answered. \u201cRoom 407. New Coventry Medical Center. Only the best.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cBy the way,\u201d he added as he picked up Claire\u2019s drink and toasted me with it. \u201cYou did very well tonight, Roger.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>That unnecessary split happened enough that it was annoying, but certainly not enough to diminish the overall fantasticity of this novel. If you ever needed a posterbook for the validity of self-publishing, this is it.<\/p>\n<p>And one aside, which I don\u2019t know if it was tongue-in-cheek or not. A vague reference is made to the movie <em>Poltergeist<\/em>, but the story is set in 1978 and that movie didn\u2019t come out until 1982. I could see how that could go either way, so I\u2019m giving the author the benefit of the doubt.<\/p>\n<p>This is the story of 50-year-old professor of mathematics William Teale and Virginia, his romance-novel-writer wife and Claire, Teale\u2019s lost love from 25 years ago. It\u2019s told from the point of view of his 25-year-old intern, Roger, in first person. And oh, it takes place in 1978. Did I say that already?<\/p>\n<p>This book\u2019s kinda sorta billed as a romance. I think. I\u2019m not really sure. And I don\u2019t really know what it is anyway except hilarious. I know it\u2019s supposed to be poignant and bittersweet. I know it\u2019s supposed to be about Teale\u2019s relationship with his wife and his lost love. Really, I do know that.<\/p>\n<p>But what you have to know going in is that I have an eccentric sense of humor and a wee bit of a crush on higher math. Can\u2019t add or subtract without a calculator (multiplication and long division are simply out of the question) and I really just don\u2019t care for discrete math much, but after some struggle and time, I\u2019m a fair hand at simpler calculus. It\u2019s like the bad boy you just want to take home and try to tame.<\/p>\n<p>Okay, so what that\u2019s got to do with the price of tea in China is this: If you don\u2019t get the math jokes, it\u2019s okay. It\u2019s still funny. If you do, it\u2019s ROFLMAO funny. The author conflates mathematics and romance in such a bizarre way I can\u2019t help but chortle just thinking about it. For instance, Teale tries to figure out what to do about his problem using set theory in a discussion with Roger:<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"normal\"><p>\u201cIt\u2019s about balancing the quality of the empty set against one with two elements,\u201d I started out. \u201cThat just doesn\u2019t make sense.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cNo, it doesn\u2019t,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n<p>Relieved by that concession, I followed up.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThen how can a set of two elements be qualitatively equivalent to an empty set?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>He smiled wearily. \u201cUnexplored territory, isn\u2019t it?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>He thought a moment longer. \u201cIt\u2019s the wasteland,\u201d he said. \u201cWe understand the null set. There\u2019s nothing there. But a set of two elements which has no connection, or, if connected, no contiguousness, that is, ultimately a set that is in and of itself empty, isn\u2019t it?\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>In other words, using set theory, Teale equates his relationship with his wife (two elements in one set that are disconnected) to a set with nothing in it.<\/p>\n<p>All the little oddball characters that populate a college campus\/faculty\/town are fondly drawn and you can immediately find the equivalents of these people in the memories of your own college experience. All the subplots come together nicely in one tight, tidy little knot at the end (although I\u2019ll admit I knew where one of them was going on page 23, and sure enough).<\/p>\n<p>Now, about that \u201cromance novels are just a formula\u201d business: That is repeated <em>ad nauseam<\/em> throughout the tale, but funny enough, even though they spend valuable computer time (vacuum tubes! keypunch cards!) trying to figure it out, they read from a how-to-write-romance manual and follow it strictly, and yet \u2026 they never manage to figure it out, disproving their own premise that there\u2019s a real formula to it.<\/p>\n<p>I had no problem with this facet for three reasons: (1) Though all the characters (including the romance novel writer and her ghostwriter) think this, it doesn\u2019t seem to be thought of as a bad thing; it\u2019s simply a fact of their life and needs to be adhered to as any other product specification, as they\u2019re up against a deadline, and (2) This is set in 1978, remember. The specifications outlined are, to the best of my recollection, exactly how romances were written in the late \u201970s, so I can\u2019t really go throwing stones at fact (or at least my perception of fact), and (3) For all the \u201cformula\u201d talk, it was still respectful of the genre and its fans.<\/p>\n<p>Some passages that made me howl (and wake up the Tax Deducations) got their pages dog-eared. (The horrors!) Examples (although I must warn you that my sense of humor is a bit, ah, weird, and these are somewhat out of context so they might not translate):<\/p>\n<p>[Sample from a technical writer for a nuclear reactor handbook applying for the job of a romance novelist ghostwriter]:<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"normal\"><p>\u201c \u2026 pump type can be determined by identifying flange at top of housing. Inductive cooling pump has a rigid pressure release vent hanging down perpendicularly on flange centerline. Whereas action release coil pump is unique because of the two nipples protruding from either side directly above the emergency bleed valve.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>and<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"normal\"><p>\u201cA warning. The manifold might be hot. Use caution when sliding the spanner between the opened blades, as there is a danger of electrical arcing \u2026 It might be necessary to remove the probe from the main sheath and reinsert with proper lubrication \u2026 If vibration continues, apply appropriate torque to the uppermost junction point until release is achieved \u2026 \u201d<\/p>\n<p>[Romance novelist] closed the booklet with a rude snap.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThere has been a terrible misunderstanding here.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI\u2019m sorry?\u201d said Claire.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThis seems so\u2014how should I put it? Technical.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Even though it is in no real way similar, it vaguely reminded me of Neal Stephenson\u2019s <a href=\"https:\/\/www.amazon.com\/Big-U-Neal-Stephenson-ebook\/dp\/B0011GA0AM\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\"><em>The Big U<\/em><\/a>. Loved the premise, loved the voice, loved the characters and the humor is dry enough to make you beg for water.<\/p>\n<p>And, oh, the author didn\u2019t assume the reader would be 5 and need everything explained.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Do the Math by Philip B. Persinger \ud83d\udc94 published by iUniverse I read a review of this book that pissed me off, but the blurb looked interesting and so I went forth to iUniverse (yes, it\u2019s independently published) to purchase the ebook. I will spare you the nightmare of actually getting the book, but iUniverse? [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[521,530],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-160","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-book-reviews","category-self-publishing"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/moriahjovan.com\/talesofdunham\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/160"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/moriahjovan.com\/talesofdunham\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/moriahjovan.com\/talesofdunham\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/moriahjovan.com\/talesofdunham\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/moriahjovan.com\/talesofdunham\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=160"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/moriahjovan.com\/talesofdunham\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/160\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":17057,"href":"https:\/\/moriahjovan.com\/talesofdunham\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/160\/revisions\/17057"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/moriahjovan.com\/talesofdunham\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=160"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/moriahjovan.com\/talesofdunham\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=160"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/moriahjovan.com\/talesofdunham\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=160"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}